Publisher profile

ScienceDomain International

Explore the publisher’s assessment and the questions to resolve before choosing a journal for your research.

Overview

Start with the publisher. Then examine the journal.

This directory record brings together the published rating and assessment category for ScienceDomain International. A publisher may operate several journals with different editors, subject areas and submission requirements. Evaluate the specific journal you are considering before making a decision.

Use this profile to review the assessment, work through the publishing-practice checks below and record any questions to raise with the journal’s editorial office.

The assessment

What the rating tells you.

Read our methodology

Likely Predatory

The publisher is classified as Likely Predatory in our directory. This signals significant concerns. Examine the journal’s practices and seek advice from your library or a trusted academic colleague before proceeding.

How the assessment is formed

Our evaluation framework considers peer review, editorial credibility, transparency, publishing ethics, indexing and researcher feedback. The overall rating and category are recorded here; a criterion-by-criterion score breakdown is not included in this record.

A rating is not a guarantee of a journal’s suitability or of a particular publication outcome. Check policies at the journal level and confirm claims at their source.

Submit evidence for re-evaluation

Publishing practices
to examine.

Use this assessment framework to gather evidence for your chosen journal. These are checks to complete, not claims that every criterion has been met.

Assessment areaWhat to look forYour next step